Bexar County Judge
Primary Outlook: Nelson Favored
General Election Outlook: Nelson Favored
Bexar County Judge. Through most of the 90s Republican Cyndi Krier held this post. Since 2001, Democrat Nelson Wolff has been presiding on the Commissioners Court.
For such a powerful position, it's amazing how often it isn't contested, or at least actively challenged. In 1992, Krier defeated Tommy Adkisson (D) to become County Judge. When she ran for re-election in 1994 and 1998 she was unopposed.
When Wolff ran the first time in 2002 he faced a Republican and a Libertarian. In 2006 and 2010 he was unopposed (2006) and only faced a Libertarian (2010).
Who's running?
Running for a full 4th term is incumbent Nelson Wolff. A Democrat of the more moderate to conservative type, he's managed to avoid a primary challenge...until now.
Giving up his County Commissioner seat is Tommy Adkisson. He's previously run and lost a race for County Judge and now resides as the Precinct 4 Commissioner.
Financial as of latest filing:
Adkisson: Contributions: $91,575; Expenditures: $90,920.54; CoH: $206,833.89
Wolff: Contributions: $159,600; Expenditures: $81,749.23; CoH: $214,622.99
Online:
Adkisson: Website, Facebook, Twitter
Wolff: Website, Facebook, Twitter, Attack Site
Overall this race is HOT, HOT, HOT:
1) Fireworks. This is a race every political writer dreams of because it has fireworks. If you've been to any forum featuring Wolff and Adkisson, you will not be disappointed.
2) Race. It's a countywide race and it shows it. This race makes the DA primary look like a race for a Wednesday Afternoon Fine Arts League.
3) Money. Both candidates have enough money to really go after each other. One glaring problem for Adkisson is his burn rate. He's spending just as much as he's raising.
4) Endorsements. Looking at the endorsements in this race, it starts to look like a David vs. Goliath. Among Wolff's elected endorsers: Mayor Julian Castro, Congressman Joaquin Castro, Commissioners Paul Elizondo and Chico Rodriguez; State Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, State Reps Phil Cortez, Ruth Jones McClendon, Trey Martinez-Fischer, Jose Menendez, Justin Rodriguez, Mike Villarreal.
Among former electeds: Henry Cisneros, Phil Hardberger, Howard Peak, Art Hall, Chip Haass, Patti Radle, Roger Perez, Bonnie Conner.
Among nonelecteds (i.e., prestige and money): Henry Munoz, Frank Burney, Berto Guerra, Frank Herrera, Jane Macon, Walter Serna, Mikal Watts.
Based on the support Wolff should win this race. Add to that, his better management of campaign money, and Tommy's troubles with emails, and Wolff should easily be the nominee for November.
Showing posts with label 2014 Primary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2014 Primary. Show all posts
Monday, February 10, 2014
Monday, January 27, 2014
Republican Lite Gov Debate Snap Judgement
After watching the freak show that took place, I feel guilty for not having paid for a ticket.
For those able to keep your dinner down and managing to avoid a trip to the great white porcelain bowl, kudos.
For those able to keep your dinner down and managing to avoid a trip to the great white porcelain bowl, kudos.
Saturday, January 25, 2014
Defense's Opening Statement: Race for Bexar County DA
Bexar County District Attorney
Primary Outlook: Lean LaHood
General Election Outlook: Republican Favored
Bexar County DA. Democrats have been trying to knock incumbent DA Susan Reed (R) out of this job for several elections. Reed has held this post since her election in 1998 when she beat District Judge Mary Roman (D). Reed won that year 57% - 43%.
4 years later Reed went unchallenged by Democrats. In hindsight you have to scratch your head and wonder why? Democrats won an open Republican district court bench and nearly swept the County Courts-at-Law benches winning 10 out of 12. In addition, Democrats beat the incumbent District Clerk, who was the head of the Republican's 2002 campaign.
Fast forward another 4 years and Democrats did challenge, although not wholeheartedly. Reed beat back a local attorney 61% - 39%. This was the same year Democrats captured 4 district court benches. Go figure.
Arriving at the year that shall not be named, Democrats gave Reed her toughest race to date. Attorney Nico LaHood held Reed to her lowest margin yet 54% - 46%.
Who's Running?
Returning for a second try is attorney Nico LaHood. Many Democrats remember him from his race in 2010 and his better than expected showing. He has a background story that is a double-edged sword. He was arrested for selling drugs back in 1994 and 2 years later his brother was murdered in his parent's driveway. He's been a defendant and a victim.
Challenging LaHood in the primary is attorney Therese Huntzinger. This is Huntzinger's second run for office, having previously challenged Judge Carmen Kelsey in 1998 as a Republican. Huntzinger is openly gay and if she won would likely be thrust into the spotlight. Her previous run-in with the law was a DWI in 1982.
Financial as of latest filing:
Huntzinger: Contributions: $27,110; Expenditures: $6,300.55; CoH: $17,777.94
LaHood: Contributions: $111,170; Expenditures: $11,467.39; CoH: $99,702.61
Online:
Huntzinger: Website, Facebook
LaHood: Facebook
Overall we give this primary race 3 peppers:
1) Race. Unlike the primary for County Judge, this race hasn't produced any fireworks. Still it is a countywide race for the top lawyer in the county which means it will make news.
2) Money. LaHood clearly has the edge in money and if he wins the primary will definitely need it for the fall.
3) Endorsements. How often do Spurs players get involved in politics?
Lahood's name ID combined with his money should be enough to carry him through the primary. He also brings backing from some of the Spurs players including Tim Duncan and Tony Parker. In addition he seems to have consolidated establishment support from people like State Sen. Leticia Van de Putte and Congressman Joaquin Castro.
Huntzinger did however score the endorsement of the Express-News. If she can turn that endorsement into some campaign cash, she might have a chance to beat LaHood. The other factor that is in her favor is newness. She's the new face might be able to make the argument of not having lost to Susan Reed. She might also get some cash infusion if the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund endorses her.
All things considered, if I had to choose, I'd say right now LaHood wins the primary.
Primary Outlook: Lean LaHood
General Election Outlook: Republican Favored
Bexar County DA. Democrats have been trying to knock incumbent DA Susan Reed (R) out of this job for several elections. Reed has held this post since her election in 1998 when she beat District Judge Mary Roman (D). Reed won that year 57% - 43%.
4 years later Reed went unchallenged by Democrats. In hindsight you have to scratch your head and wonder why? Democrats won an open Republican district court bench and nearly swept the County Courts-at-Law benches winning 10 out of 12. In addition, Democrats beat the incumbent District Clerk, who was the head of the Republican's 2002 campaign.
Fast forward another 4 years and Democrats did challenge, although not wholeheartedly. Reed beat back a local attorney 61% - 39%. This was the same year Democrats captured 4 district court benches. Go figure.
Arriving at the year that shall not be named, Democrats gave Reed her toughest race to date. Attorney Nico LaHood held Reed to her lowest margin yet 54% - 46%.
Who's Running?
Returning for a second try is attorney Nico LaHood. Many Democrats remember him from his race in 2010 and his better than expected showing. He has a background story that is a double-edged sword. He was arrested for selling drugs back in 1994 and 2 years later his brother was murdered in his parent's driveway. He's been a defendant and a victim.
Challenging LaHood in the primary is attorney Therese Huntzinger. This is Huntzinger's second run for office, having previously challenged Judge Carmen Kelsey in 1998 as a Republican. Huntzinger is openly gay and if she won would likely be thrust into the spotlight. Her previous run-in with the law was a DWI in 1982.
Financial as of latest filing:
Huntzinger: Contributions: $27,110; Expenditures: $6,300.55; CoH: $17,777.94
LaHood: Contributions: $111,170; Expenditures: $11,467.39; CoH: $99,702.61
Online:
Huntzinger: Website, Facebook
LaHood: Facebook
Overall we give this primary race 3 peppers:
1) Race. Unlike the primary for County Judge, this race hasn't produced any fireworks. Still it is a countywide race for the top lawyer in the county which means it will make news.
2) Money. LaHood clearly has the edge in money and if he wins the primary will definitely need it for the fall.
3) Endorsements. How often do Spurs players get involved in politics?
Lahood's name ID combined with his money should be enough to carry him through the primary. He also brings backing from some of the Spurs players including Tim Duncan and Tony Parker. In addition he seems to have consolidated establishment support from people like State Sen. Leticia Van de Putte and Congressman Joaquin Castro.
Huntzinger did however score the endorsement of the Express-News. If she can turn that endorsement into some campaign cash, she might have a chance to beat LaHood. The other factor that is in her favor is newness. She's the new face might be able to make the argument of not having lost to Susan Reed. She might also get some cash infusion if the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund endorses her.
All things considered, if I had to choose, I'd say right now LaHood wins the primary.
Sunday, January 12, 2014
When will the Adkisson tape surface?
There is an advantage to having been around one place long enough, especially in politics. Hanging around long enough you know where the bodies are buried. In addition, you also build a long memory and can recall certain items that others have since forgotten.
In this instance, we're waiting for damaging video of Tommy Adkisson to surface and come back to haunt him. Either on YouTube or in a campaign advertisement.
There exists a video out there that if used could very seriously damage his campaign as well as any ambition he has to run for something else.
The tape is a number of years old, but is probably still a potent weapon.
I guess the questions is which local news station will be the first to search their archives and strike gold?

In this instance, we're waiting for damaging video of Tommy Adkisson to surface and come back to haunt him. Either on YouTube or in a campaign advertisement.
There exists a video out there that if used could very seriously damage his campaign as well as any ambition he has to run for something else.
The tape is a number of years old, but is probably still a potent weapon.
I guess the questions is which local news station will be the first to search their archives and strike gold?

Saturday, January 11, 2014
March Primary Prediction: Tommy will get his Adkisson kicked by Nelson Wolff
Today incumbent Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolff kicked off his campaign.
Today I'd like to make a prediction: Tommy will get his Adkisson kicked by Nelson Wolff
For reasons beyond anyone's comprehension, Precinct 4 County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson (D) is challenging incumbent County Judge Nelson Wolff (D). (Personally, having met Tommy on numerous occasions, I like the guy, but really fail to see how he thinks challenging Nelson is a good idea)
Word is that among Adkisson's reasons for the primary challenge is he doesn't like the way he's treated at the courthouse, he thinks has been there too long, and he thinks Nelson is setting it up so that the job of county judge gets handed over to Precinct 3 County Commissioner Kevin Wolff (R). No doubt Adkisson will have some legitimate reasons for wanting the top job, but just to go through these 3...
1) If you don't like the way you're treated, do something to change it. If he's referring to the way the other commissioners treat him, does he really think that if he became county judge that would suddenly all change?
2) This is probably the stupidest reason. Nelson has been there too long? Nelson was appointed County Judge in 2001. Tommy was elected to Pct. 4 Commissioner in 1998 and has been serving since 1999.
3) Nelson preparing the way for Kevin. I'll confess that I don't know all the rules regarding vacancies on the Commissioners Court, but Nelson was appointed to County Judge after Cyndi Taylor Krier (R) resigned. If is re-elected and resigns mid-term, the Commissioners (I'm assuming) would get to appoint his replacement. I understand the Commissioners might show deference to Nelson's pick, but I can't imagine 3 Democrats appointing a Republican. Especially given that fact, that if Susan Reed is re-elected to another term, that would mean the DA, Sheriff, and County Judge positions would all be held by Republicans. Democrats would still have a majority on the Commissioners Court (if they hold Precinct 4), but think about the fundraising advantage for Republicans and the fact that those 3 Democrats (assuming Pct 4 is a hold) would have to go to the primary voters and defend appointing a Republican.
4) A fourth reason that Adkisson has been hitting Wolff on has been party loyalty. At first glance this is a pretty good line of attack for Adkisson. At first glance. However, Adkisson had, as a political consultant for a number of years, JoAnn Ramon working for him and running his campaigns. She has worked for Democrats and Republicans. And now Adkisson's campaign manager is Christian Anderson. Like Ramon, Anderson has worked for Democrats and Republicans. So yes, that loyalty attack is pretty good at first glance. But when looking at who Adkisson has employed to help run his campaigns, suddenly party loyalty gets a little fuzzy.
Today I'd like to make a prediction: Tommy will get his Adkisson kicked by Nelson Wolff
For reasons beyond anyone's comprehension, Precinct 4 County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson (D) is challenging incumbent County Judge Nelson Wolff (D). (Personally, having met Tommy on numerous occasions, I like the guy, but really fail to see how he thinks challenging Nelson is a good idea)
Word is that among Adkisson's reasons for the primary challenge is he doesn't like the way he's treated at the courthouse, he thinks has been there too long, and he thinks Nelson is setting it up so that the job of county judge gets handed over to Precinct 3 County Commissioner Kevin Wolff (R). No doubt Adkisson will have some legitimate reasons for wanting the top job, but just to go through these 3...
1) If you don't like the way you're treated, do something to change it. If he's referring to the way the other commissioners treat him, does he really think that if he became county judge that would suddenly all change?
2) This is probably the stupidest reason. Nelson has been there too long? Nelson was appointed County Judge in 2001. Tommy was elected to Pct. 4 Commissioner in 1998 and has been serving since 1999.
3) Nelson preparing the way for Kevin. I'll confess that I don't know all the rules regarding vacancies on the Commissioners Court, but Nelson was appointed to County Judge after Cyndi Taylor Krier (R) resigned. If is re-elected and resigns mid-term, the Commissioners (I'm assuming) would get to appoint his replacement. I understand the Commissioners might show deference to Nelson's pick, but I can't imagine 3 Democrats appointing a Republican. Especially given that fact, that if Susan Reed is re-elected to another term, that would mean the DA, Sheriff, and County Judge positions would all be held by Republicans. Democrats would still have a majority on the Commissioners Court (if they hold Precinct 4), but think about the fundraising advantage for Republicans and the fact that those 3 Democrats (assuming Pct 4 is a hold) would have to go to the primary voters and defend appointing a Republican.
4) A fourth reason that Adkisson has been hitting Wolff on has been party loyalty. At first glance this is a pretty good line of attack for Adkisson. At first glance. However, Adkisson had, as a political consultant for a number of years, JoAnn Ramon working for him and running his campaigns. She has worked for Democrats and Republicans. And now Adkisson's campaign manager is Christian Anderson. Like Ramon, Anderson has worked for Democrats and Republicans. So yes, that loyalty attack is pretty good at first glance. But when looking at who Adkisson has employed to help run his campaigns, suddenly party loyalty gets a little fuzzy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)